In reference to the editorial which used the action of the convention of the Diocese of Washington as a negative example of "keeping the conversation going" [TLC, March 18], it is important to know that the resolution (there was only one in which the issues of sexuality and ordination of women were combined) which was defeated sought to return the conversation to a "neutral" starting point, as if no decisions had already been made.

The conversation has not stopped in Washington, nor will it. It is clear, however, by the overwhelming vote that the convention does not want to continually go over old ground. There is, rather, a great spirit of moving forward in all areas of mission and ministry here.

I was one of those on the floor of convention whom the editorial describes as an "emphatic opponent." I did not say, however, nor did anyone else, that there was "no need for dialogue." I said there was need for dialogue on how we stay together with differences of opinion and practice on these issues, but not on whether or not women or gay and lesbian persons should be ordained.

Those issues were settled in the Diocese of Washington long ago.

(The Rev.) Michael W. Hopkins

St. George's Church

Glenn Dale, Md.